|
1.5.9 Choosing EqualityVersion 1.0 October 2022                                           (Previous Version) If Love is not enough, what else is required? Could valuing Equality be enough, on its own? If we choose Equality as a core value, what does it mean? Which kinds of equality should we value? In the previous section (1.5.8) we have emphasized that Love itself is not enough. In this section we discuss this further, then show that as a guideline for behaviour Love must be buttressed by Equality. We discuss possible dimensions of equality that we could choose to support. In the next section (1.5.10) we show that for a complete set of ethical guidelines Love and Equality are not enough, but must be supplemented by Responsibility. We discuss choosing Equality under the following headings.
This is the current summary of our conclusions in this area: 1.5.9  Love alone is insufficient as a foundational guiding principle for ethical behaviour. We choose the core ethical value of Equality, to treat other people as equals or equally deserving in certain respects.          In doing this, we acknowledge our human nature, in that we will preference our family and friends in many situations. But we can reasonably expect corporate bodies such as governments, companies and businesses to be more objective and value Equality without this bias. And we can expect individuals to be more objective and treat people equally when there are minimal emotional impacts.          We value equality before the law and equality of treatment in civil society, regardless of age, sex, gender, social status, race, religion, caste, class, ability or disability, appearance, dress, and so on.          We not only must provide everyone with opportunities to succeed but ensure that we minimise unfair disadvantage that prevents people from succeeding. Sometimes it is appropriate to ensure everyone gets their fair share of help, but in other cases help should be provided when needed with no arbitrary cap. Similarly reward for effort and appointment on merit are good principle to follow, provided we also take steps to compensate for unfair disadvantages.          We value the widespread provision of welfare services, such as education, health care, accommodation, legal aid and emergency income support, rather than a universal income, primarily on efficiency grounds.   more
Members can tell us (publicly) what they think of this page. How can we improve it? Enter your comments.
* * * * * * *
|
|
We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of Country, throughout all colonised lands, and their connections to land, waters and community. We pay respect by giving voice to truth, values and social justice, acknowledging our shared history, and valuing the cultures of first nations peoples.
Copyright © 2008 - 2026 Trevor J Rogers, care of the address shown on this page. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the copyright owner. Any approved reproduction is permitted only with full attribution of the source, referring to this site and this copyright notice. The moral right of the author is asserted.
Top